PSPLAN013Analyse the semantics and sociolinguistics of Auslan

Generate a complete, audit-ready assessment tool for this unit in minutes: candidate assessment, assessor guide with model answers, and a coverage matrix mapped to every component below. Reviewed and approved by your qualified person, exported under your branding.

Every new account includes a free credit — no card, no subscription.

What an assessment for PSPLAN013 must cover

35 assessable components: 4 elements (14 performance criteria), 8 performance evidence and 11 knowledge evidence requirements, plus 2 foundation skills. An audit-defensible tool maps every question and task back to these — that mapping is the coverage matrix Auditori generates alongside the assessment.

Elements & performance criteria

1 Analyse sign and word meanings in Auslan and English.

  • 1.1Compare the lexicon of Auslan and English in terms of size and function.
  • 1.2Investigate examples of signs in Auslan and words in English that have a matching citation sign and lexical word but no semantic equivalence.
  • 1.3Identify the concept of semantic equivalence in terms of clauses, rather than words.
  • 1.4Relate this equivalence to the concepts of literal versus free interpretation.

2 Evaluate the impact of particular social factors on linguistic variation.

  • 2.1Evaluate various factors that affect linguistic choices Auslan signers and English speakers make.
  • 2.2Identify how language can vary depending on various factors.

3 Analyse the use of non-literal devices in Auslan.

  • 3.1Identify examples of metaphor in English and Auslan.
  • 3.2Observe how Auslan uses metaphors in order to make iconic signs.
  • 3.3Examine words in English and signs in Auslan which may be considered taboo by some people.
  • 3.4Define the meaning of euphemism and why speakers and signers use euphemism.

4 Identify issues in the standardisation of Auslan.

  • 4.1Define standardisation of language to understand how dialects affect languages and linguistic choices.
  • 4.2Analyse factors which influence the standardisation of languages in general.
  • 4.3Analyse factors which influence the standardisation of sign languages.
  • 4.4Determine advantages and disadvantages of standardising Auslan.

Performance evidence

  • complete a written, verbal or Auslan signed report to include: five examples of signs in Auslan and words in English that have a matching citation sign and lexical word but no semantic equivalence
  • an evaluation of five factors that affect the linguistic choices Auslan signers and English speakers make; to include social and contextual factors
  • definitions of metaphor and euphemism and how these are used to enrich communication
  • examples of four taboo words or signs and evaluation of why these may cause offence
  • arguments for and against standardisation of Auslan
  • watch a proficient or native Auslan signer deliver a live text, which can be deliberately delivered at a moderate speed, and identify: use of semantic equivalence, use of non-equivalent semantics between English and Auslan, use of metaphor, use of euphemism
  • produce and deliver different three Auslan texts, each lasting for a maximum of three minutes, that cumulatively use: semantic equivalence, non-equivalent semantics between English and Auslan, metaphor, euphemism
  • During the delivery of the texts, the individual can: ask for assessor clarification twice, correct and repeat own signed text twice, show idiosyncrasies in sign production, pause, hesitate and repeat signs, communicate meaning using signed sentences without presenting a text which is cohesive overall

Knowledge evidence

  • word classes and word order in English
  • sign classes and sign order in Auslan
  • common morphological and syntactic structures In English and Auslan
  • the meaning of metaphor and reasons why people use metaphor in spoken and signed languages
  • how Auslan uses metaphor to make iconic signs
  • a range of English words which might be considered taboo in Auslan
  • the meaning of euphemism and reasons why people use euphemism in spoken and signed languages
  • various factors that affect the linguistic choices Auslan signers and English speakers make: personal factors: age, school attended, gender, religion, educational background; level and type of education, language of family, age at which learnt to sign (native and non-native signers), whether signer was fluent in another language prior to learning Auslan; contextual factors: location or circumstance of communication – school, work, church, medical, legal, how many people are involved in the communication; one, two or more than two, belonging to a particular subgroup within the Deaf community, especially the Deafblind community, need to adjust signing to communicate with less proficient signers, signers using different dialects, signers of different ages and genders
  • factors which may affect the standardisation of languages in general and sign languages in particular
  • advantages of standardising Auslan to include: teaching and use of standardised signs for ease of communication, easier production of standardised teaching resources, ease of communication between Deaf people, rather than idiomatic varieties causing communication barriers outside a small circle of users
  • disadvantages of standardising Auslan to include: barriers to personal use of regional or group dialects, loss of ownership by Deaf people and individual communities, difficulty in standardising a language with no written form

Foundation skills

  • Reading skills: interpret unfamiliar information of varying complexity.
  • Communication skills: produce short Auslan texts to demonstrate understanding of semantic equivalence, and use of metaphor and euphemism.

Unit content sourced from training.gov.au — © Commonwealth of Australia, licensed under CC BY 4.0. Auditori is not affiliated with the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations.

See what you get before you start

Real, unedited Auditori output (RIIHAN201E shown), branded for a sample RTO:

Questions about assessing PSPLAN013

What does an assessment tool for PSPLAN013 need to cover?

To satisfy the Principles of Assessment and Rules of Evidence, an assessment for PSPLAN013 needs to address all 35 unit components: 4 elements with 14 performance criteria, 8 performance evidence requirements, 11 knowledge evidence requirements, and the foundation skills. A coverage matrix mapping each question and task to these components is what an auditor looks for.

How does Auditori generate an assessment tool for PSPLAN013?

Auditori pulls the current release of PSPLAN013 from training.gov.au and generates a complete package: candidate assessment, assessor guide with model answers and observation criteria, and a coverage matrix mapping every component. A suitably qualified person then reviews and approves the draft in a built-in workflow — consistent with ASQA's guidance on AI use in VET — before export as branded PDF and editable Word.

Is the first assessment tool really free?

Yes. Every new account includes one free credit — enough to generate the complete assessment tool for PSPLAN013 — with no card and no subscription required. After that it's pay-as-you-go per unit.

Can I check my existing PSPLAN013 assessment instead of generating a new one?

Yes — upload your existing assessment or learner guide and Auditori maps it against every element, performance criterion, PE and KE of PSPLAN013, showing exactly what's covered and what's missing. Mapping costs a quarter of a credit.

Related units

Your PSPLAN013 assessment tool, in minutes.

First unit free. No card, no RTO registration, no subscription.

Generate PSPLAN013 free